Q. I have been living with my girlfriend for four years. Three years ago we agreed to enter into a domestic partnership and filled out and signed the registration papers. She told me she had filed them with the Secretary of State. We separated last month, and when I asked her to help me financially and to divide our property she said I have no rights because she never mailed in the registration and we aren't legally RDPs. Is she right?
A. She may not be right if you can meet the legal test to qualify as a "putative domestic partner."
California Family Code section 2251 sets forth remedies regarding the division of property in cases of annulments, or where a marriage turns out to be void or voidable because of some legal defect (for instance, where the parties could not be legally married because one party had not properly obtained a termination of an earlier marital status before entering the new union). In cases of void or voidable marriages, no marital rights or obligations actually attach
unless one party can establish what is known as
putative spouse status.
The putative spouse doctrine was intended to protect "innocent spouses" - the partner who reasonably believes the parties were married - as long as their is an objective basis in reality for that person to have held that belief.
This doctrine now applies equally to putative domestic partners.
For one spouse or domestic partner to qualify for this protection there must have been an attempted compliance with the procedures for creating a valid marriage or registered domestic partnership. Sincerely believing that a marriage or domestic partnership existed by itself is not enough. Do you have a copy of the registration document that was never filed? This is exactly the type of evidence that would be most useful in establishing an objective basis for having believed you were registered.
In a very similar case - In re Domestic Partnership of Ellis & Arriaga (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1000 - Darren Ellis and David Arriaga complied with the first step in the procedure for creating an RDP, the completion of the registration papers. Arriaga was supposed to mail the registration to the Secretary of State, but he never did. When Ellis filed a Petition to Dissolve the Domestic Partnership, Arriaga asked the trial court to dismiss Ellis' action on the ground that no RDP in fact existed. The trial court agreed with Arriaga, but the appellate court reversed the trial court's ruling.
The appellate court held that a person's reasonable, good faith belief that his or her RDP was validly registered with the Secretary of State entitled that person to the rights and duties of an actual registered domestic partner - even where the partnership never was in fact registered - under this equitable putative spouse doctrine.
However the court also restated the rule of putative spouses that the question is tested by an objective standard - not just by what one party believed, however genuinely. For instance, if both parties know that the registration was never mailed neither can qualify as putative domestic partners because without a belief in the mailing it would not be objectively reasonable to conclude an RDP existed.
Parties who qualify for putative spouse and putative domestic partnership status may be entitled to all of the benefits and burdens of marital partners or RDP's. This includes rights to property acquired during marriage, responsibilities for debt incurred during marriage, and support benefits. You can get more information concerning those issues - which are largely the same as if you were married persons - by using our search engine at the top of the page.
The likelihood of your success depends a lot on what evidence you can produce establishing that you reasonably believed the formalities were complied with. If your former partner admits that you both completed the document but that she never mailed it AND never told you that she hadn't mailed it (unfortunately people tend to be dishonest about these things in the face of legal proceedings), you are likely to prevail.
If she denies it and you don't have a copy of the registration papers you need to look to other evidence to establish the basis for your belief the two of you were registered - for instance, if a witness can testify that your partner held herself out to be your RDP that may persuade a court.
Are there any other documents that were ever signed (i.e., applications for benefits of any kind, joint bank accounts, trust documents or wills) that make reference to your purported status? If so these should be collected and submitted to the Court.
You would initiate a proceeding just like you would if there had actually been a RDP - this would be a Petition to Dissolve a Domestic Partnership.
Finally, you still may have the basis for a civil Marvin claim which is founded upon written or oral promises to undertake a joint asset pooling arrangement or joint venture when two people decide to share lives (however, your chances of recovering support or "palimony" are slim). I will blog Marvin actions another day.
Thurman W. Arnold III