Recent Posts in Divorce Equanimity Category
| April 18, 2012 |
| Divorce and Family Law HORROR STORIES - How the System Is Broken! SHARE Yours With Us? |
| Posted By Thurman W. Arnold CFLS |
 |
Share Your Family Law Horror Story?
I want to thank all of you who write me about the difficult circumstances and horror stories surrounding your divorce and other family law matters, both in and out of divorce court. I receive dozens of emails each month from non-client readers, many who need help and so have questions, many who are merely venting, and many who have deep problems with how the government sponsored system for resolving family law disputes has unfolded and been applied for them, or misused.
I am not able to respond to every email, and for those who really want was is in effect a consultation with me (by seeking detailed answers to complex questions, for instance) I suggest you consider a phone or Skype conference with me or Mike Peterson at my office. I bill $350/hour for those consults and Mike bills at $250/hour.
However, for those who simply wish to have their often tragic stories heard I've decided to open up a portion of my website for posting them. Your experiences may be useful to others, and I imagine others similarly situated will read them with great interest. I think there should be a forum for people to communicate the good and bad of what they've been through.
Therefore, you must understand that I have a busy law practice along with a website that requires my constant attention and so am practically limited in my time and ability to respond or educate people about the law, your options, tactics you might try to change the course of your case or situation, and so on. I may not be able to enter into an ongoing dialogue with many of you, and don't want you to be offended if my responses are truncated, but if you wish to share your situations and experiences and if they are appropriately written, I will post them in a new section of my website that I am creating.
Your stories - if you'd like me to share them with the world for you - shouldn't simply be rants, but they certainly can express the poignancy of your situation. They need to be coherently (but not perfectly) written, not be abusive, respect other's rights to privacy, and provide enough information that a reader can follow them. I will create editorial guidelines as this concept develops. If you wish to have your story posted you will have to give me the rights to use it as I see fit.
Again, I will refine how this will work. For now I will watch to see whether creating such a forum is something the public really desires - both in terms of people sharing their experience as well as others caring to read about them. Hence, this concept is a work in progress.
If this makes sense to you and is something you wish to undertake, send me your stories at twarnold@verizon.net - don't use my on-line intake forms or blog comments because the length is limited in what I receive.
Thurman W. Arnold, III, C.F.L.S. |
 |
| Continue reading "Divorce and Family Law HORROR STORIES - How the System Is Broken! SHARE Yours With Us?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
| February 26, 2012 |
| Mindfully Redefining the Expectations Surrounding Divorce |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
The Challenge of Seeing Things As They Really Are
Q. What is meant by the concept "redefining the expectations surrounding divorce"?
A. We all have an amazing ability to rewrite history. We often view the circumstances of our marriage quite differently in hindsight from how
they originally seemed, and it is natural that our minds invent stories about the other party that color how we approach divorce. But what if you could choose what your divorce and its aftermath might look like? How would you hope to view all 'those wasted years' today, tomorrow, next week, next year, in 10 years, or as you reflect upon your life as you prepare for your own inevitable exit?
We rarely consider these questions with balanced interest. Instead, our minds become stuck on stories that tend to cause our experience in reality to replicate the attitudes in our heads. These stories often just aren't true, or are quite incomplete. This is mindlessness in practice, and it is our default condition.
As with most questions, it is to be expected that we will formulate our answers from the core of our own interests.
If you could set aside your fear and anger, how might you like your divorce to feel for you and for your spouse?
Mindfulness is a great teacher if we can listen, and it may offer a framework for understanding why we become conflicted. It teaches us to pay attention to the thoughts and attitudes that arise within us in order to test whether they are true - and not to judge or suppress our "answers". It can be illuminating to notice how wounded answers operate to control the course of our lives.
Our views about what is happening to us are always linked to how our self-centered "me" feels. This egoic personality is sometimes called the "Little Me". Our worse fantasies, most selfish or destructive thoughts, and our day to day self centeredness all derive from a sense of a wounded Little Me.
The Little Me is our egoic conditioning. Recognizing the "Little Me" for what it is is an amazing accomplishment. It opens the door to recognizing something infinitely larger - that which notices the Little Me. Spiritual philosphers call this the "Inner Guru." Our highest aspirations, and our most transcendent moments, resonate within and are observed and recognized by our Inner Guru. We are all familiar with both characters, whatever we name them.
"Little Me" is the character that we think we are. It is the filter that judges our selves and everyone else, the one with the committe and all its opinions. It shifts and inverts from moment to moment. Little Me wants above all to be entertained, and it attaches to material things and romantic imagery. It is the part of you that is always in argument with what is happening.
Our Little Me is not awake. Sure, it moves, it bustles around, it can seem quite energetic - hell, it bounces off the walls all the time. But that is not a state of Awakeness. The Little Me might beg to differ, but let it beg. No answer or response will satisfy it anyway. The Little Me is our 2 year old personality structure at an arrested emotional stage of development. It can be quite beguiling like any child, dripping with sweetness and unction one moment and the most terrible tyrant the next. Little Me is a chameleon, and getting rid of the Little Me is like trying to rid yourself of your shadow. Better to know that is not what is going to happen, and if you go to war with your Little Me it is just the Little Me pretending to battle itself.
Your Inner Guru is something quite larger. It is wise enough to be all embracing and all inclusive, and it loves the Little Me with uncompromising compassion. To the Little Me the Inner Guru seems to fly on gossamer wings, and seems tied to some other inaccesible dimension. That perception is not true.
Mindfulness is nothing more than the aliveness of the Inner Guru expressing its aliveness in any given moment. It is allowing the natural spontaneous truth of life to express itself. It seems quite a task to remember that. This sense of difficulty is natural, but it is simply a mistaken apprehension.
So, what might one do?
To find an answer, it is important to consider who or what is asking the question. If the aspect of ourselves that we may call Little Me is asking the question, buckle up.
It is through mindfulness whether as a meditation practice, gentle self-inquiry, or just a gradual flowering of recognition and intention, that we allow the Inner Guru to address the question.
We might ask the question differently: How would my Inner Guru wish this divorce of mine to feel, to me and all other beings?
There is a transformative power in this question. Do you notice that when the Little Me drops out of the equation, when "I" am not the central questioner, previously unnoticed possibilities pop into view?
We need to begin somewhere, and a list is as good a place as any. When we connect to a heartfelt place of best intentions, and examine those intentions in a committed manner, certain themes arise that we did not before consciously consider and could not otherwise organize. This allows us to peer deeper than when stuck in the autopilot of trance conditioning, as we often are. It doesn't matter whether you list what you don't want or what you do want, but try listing it from both directions. Pick which ever is easiest for you to begin, and grab a sheet of paper or better yet a journal. Do any of these resonate?
I don't want to cause pain to my loved ones.
I don't want my children to suffer.
I don't want to repeat my own parent's experience.
I don't want to be angry.
I don't want to be scared.
I am tired of blame.
I am tired of shame.
I don't even want to cause pain for myself.
I don't want to be stuck.
I don't want to be self-centered all the time.
I don't want to impose my story of suffering on those around me.
I don't want to feel vulnerable all the time.
I don't want to feel a victim.
I don't want to be sad.
I don't want to feel physically unwell.
I don't want to react all the time.
I don't want to need to apologize because of what I've said or done.
I don't want ______
Do this exercise with gentle humor and patient kindness and understand what is written above may be a long list for you, or maybe a short list. The key is keep listing until you've exhausted the thoughts and feelings that arise and wish to express themselves. You can also run another sheet at the same time, or wait until you are finished with your first one, but however you approach the list, each item will suggest its opposite.
I want to love.
I want to be loved.
I want peace.
I want to be a positive force.
I want to be awake.
I want to be mindful.
I want to forgive.
I want to be forgiven.
I want to get on with my life.
I want _______.
Now, when you are done with both lists, ask yourself this question: Is the best of what I want for myself, the same as what I want for all others? Is the best of what I want, what I want for my divorce? Is it what I want for my spouse or partner? Is is possible that they would want the same things for themselves and for me? And even if they don't want the same things for me, does that matter - for me?
Finally, write down what resonated for you in making these lists. Entitle it "Mission Statement" or something else. And consider making a prayer, or whatever you wish to call it, that these goals remain your highest intention and that you may remind mindful of them, in pursuing them.
Then, congratulate yourself. You have just examined more than most people ever consider! You have glimpsed deep mindfulness, and have a sense what it looks like and where to access it. You have expressed an intention to be present and well, and so begun a journey to healing. You have realized that just because you have a story of who did what to whom, that doesn't make the story true - indeed, you now have a reason to be immediately suspicious of such stories.
And you have arrived at the door to a way of being that may guide and carry you safely through the journey, all the way home.

|
 |
| Continue reading "Mindfully Redefining the Expectations Surrounding Divorce" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
| August 03, 2011 |
| Divorce and Family Lawyers Who LIE - EQUANIMITY and DIVORCE PRACTICE |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Lawyers Who Lie
Some lawyers, like some people, lie to the Court - particularly in the more contentious of family law cases where emotions run highest. Our culture (and our lower natures) places so much value upon our sense of being entitled to getting what we want, regardless whether it is earned or deserved or the suffering it inflicts upon others when it is not, that otherwise decent, moral people disconnect from their sworn oaths, and more. I often remind my clients that while the judicial system aspires to do justice, the adversarial system only has enough time and resources to devote in any given case to approximate the appearance of justice. For those people who face dishonest lawyers, I apologize and sympathize deeply with your predicament. These men and women seem to forget that real people are involved and that outcomes ruin not on the lives of the parties themselves, but also their children. This of course models behaviors that will repeat - often for generations. I will speculate that lawyers who lie learned the related behaviors from trauma within their own families of origin.
Fortunately it is a rare event in my experience. Most attorneys are honest and ethical, at least in my small community. In 30 years of practice I can count the times that opposing counsel themselves submitted perjured testimony to a Judge. These attorneys became so personally aligned with their clients, or so egotistically challenged, that boundaries evaporated and they became willing to say anything.
There are also a middle category of divorce attorneys whose advocacy style relies upon disinformation but not necessarily outright misrepresentation. It is not uncommon to hear some story or event postured in ways that the lawyer knows are untrue and go beyond a lawyer's ethical obligation to paint his client in a favorable light. Whole stories can even be spun out and laid out before a judicial officer under the guise of "argument" even though no evidence supports the argument, and it is inflammatory, painful to listen to, and without foundation. I believe that why the public, and other lawyers and bench officers, most hold family law attorneys in lowered esteem is because such behaviors are so common among the legal brothers and sisters that it is considered as natural and even humorous. This style of practice exists in a zone of greyishness, one that is reinforced by the conditioning that lawyers receive early on and may be compounded by their own personal histories.
While the latter situations are unfortunate, they occur frequently enough that I've grown desensitized to them. Unfortunately, judges - who can't necessarily discern truth any faster than the rest of us, especially with their limited time and resources - often decline to control these situations. The California Family Code does not provide clear direction or remedies that are efficient and not cumbersome.
This is why I advocate an amendment to Family Code section 271 or a parallel statute authorizing sanctions awards directly against attorneys, and not just their clients, under circumstances and for lawyer conduct that we really could categorize easily since the legal bunch can list it easily. Caselaw is divided whether the existing section covers attorneys themselves for their own misconduct. If attorneys are not personally responsible for their actions under the umbrella of "zealous representation" then training the public to curb their attack dogs will take forever and not be successful.
Lawyers accusing lawyers of unethical behavior is painful and unseemly and this discussion is uncomfortable for lawyers. The dangers in making attorney misconduct directly sanctionable in family law cases include adding another layer where potential manipulative name-calling abuses can occur and even more court time can be consumed. But if we agree attorney misconduct should be deterred, and that the costs to clients and court that they case are equally or more substantial, how else might we achieve this? If lawyers cannot be held accountable, even as their clients may find up footing the consequences as illustrated in the Davenport decision, then we must expect more of the same.
Equanimity is difficult in such circumstances. Adversarial litigation brings the worst out of some people. Many lawyers fit that profile - and certainly many clients lost in the land of relationship end are in a deep destructive trance where the perceived benefits of the ends justify the means. Hell, we all fit that profile from time to time. Unfortunately, those ends never are grounded in anything but illusion.
"All creatures desire peace and happiness" - as your relationship ends, protect yourself but be strong and be whole.

|
 |
| Continue reading "Divorce and Family Lawyers Who LIE - EQUANIMITY and DIVORCE PRACTICE" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(1) |
| |
| February 20, 2010 |
| Overcoming PARENTING CONFLICTS With OURFAMILYWIZARD.COM |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Overcoming PARENTING CONFLICTS with OurFamilyWizard
Visitation and parenting exchange disputes often occur simply because of confusion or poor communication skills between parents, but they can be deeply embarrassing and distressing for children and a source of continuing anxiety and reactivity on the part of parents. Sometimes these disputes can reflect a pattern of parental alienation. They can cost divorcing parents needless expense when they feel impelled to report these frustrations to their attorneys, taking time off from work battling about who really said what and when in court, and where they feel forced to engage each other within the legal system. This wastes valuable judicial resources with a court process that tends to perpetuate conflict rather than ending it.
As a custody, visitation, and move-away lawyer I commonly receive complaints from my clients - and sometimes allegations about them - concerning failed visitation exchanges, holiday plans, or unseemly conduct between family court litigants. Often these complaints are evidenced by texting and emails, but usually they are reported to me as my client's memories of angry telephone calls back and forth. Either way, it is difficult for me to know and prove what was really said and in what order, or to sensibly provide proof to opposing counsel, family judges, or to court mediators and evaluating therapists. Even where a text log can be created or downloaded, or where emails exist, it is not only time consuming to put them into a declaration or letter form but the fact is that nobody who is umpiring such conflicts wants to read them all. Family Court judges are overburdened and don't have the time. If a non-judicial professional spends the time to review them and reports back to the Court, this probably means they are being paid by you or the other party to do so. Email communications are one of the more unwieldy forms of evidentiary records to wade through, since what occurred is contained in email threads that appear in reverse order in the form of replies.
Moreover, in my experience, people having highly charged parenting conflicts typically write texts and emails that range from being merely improvident to outrageous. Often these folks are writing with the expectation someone will read and buy into their position later, and at other times they just say something provocative or mean and hit 'send' before they can be mindful of what they are doing and how it might be interpreted later. Or how the negativity trickles down to their children.
This is a real problem for families, and it is financially and emotionally expensive.
Many Courts particularly in Los Angeles and Orange counties California, have ordered high-conflict parents to enroll with www.OurFamilyWizard.com
with some very positive results in terms of dialing down the hostilities between them and so reducing trips to court. These include a significant decline in these cases finding their way back to court. This only benefits children and the parents themselves.
www.OurFamilyWizard.com
presents a valuable mindfulness tool which holds possibilities that range from simply offering a forum for notification of soccer games, birthday, and vacation time with grandparents and others and confirming homework assignments and parent-teacher conferences to creating a 'safe' environment where one or both parents can avoid those nasty phone calls or ugly emails that so often trigger a never ending cycle of action and reaction. As such, it promises to impose some accountability, to help parents reflect upon their speech and even body language, and to make children's lives easier. It can be a valuable tool for judges and mental health professionals, as well as lawyers, to have an easily accessed record of what really happened.
www.OurFamilyWizard.com
has a number of useful features. It provides a Calendar that maps out visitation schedules and any imaginable event, like doctor visits, birthdays, or other reminders. Parents have the ability to confirm or modify their intentions as to any given event. Parents can offer to switch visitation days, and there is a record of the offer and whether or not it was accepted and if so upon what terms. It has a separate Journal function that allows private or shared entries, and gives the parent an appropriate place to praise or vent about the other parent.
It has an Expense Log function that enables parents to make requests about child support or expense reimbursements, and even to upload medical or school uniform and any other invoices so that the other parent can verify the authenticity of the requests. Payment can even be made between banks on-line with a fee far below what credit cards charge.
It allows for email or text notification of posts. There is a message board.
Benefits to using www.OurFamilyWizard.com
- It can provide an exclusive means of communicating for high-conflict parents. This allows the parents to avoid phone calls at any hour of the day or night that sometimes turn accusatory or demanding. One can take their former partner out of the loop in that sense, which may be less disruptive to new mates or even one's children who don't have hear her mother or father arguing by cell phone on the way home from school.
- It can be a one stop scheduling forum and marketplace for parents who are not in high conflict, but who are naturally time-challenged and pressured over remembering where they are supposed to be and when.
- It provides a record that cannot be undone or manipulated after the fact. For instance, emails threads can be manipulated and changed by a parent in that one can always rewrite one someone supposed said within the thread and print it out and submit it as evidence. These changes earlier on in an email thread might even go unnoticed because people don't usually suspect it and so check the thread for falsification before submitting it to courts.
- Where parents have agreed, it has been so ordered, or where records need to be subpoenaed if a family court dispute does arise, the information is available in an efficient way. The owners say they can respond to a subpoena with an appropriate declaration from the custodian of records, which makes them admissible over objection for lack of foundation and hearsay, with 24 hours.
- One can modify some functions - like schedules up to the day of an event -but thereafter entries become locked and so cannot be altered after the fact.
- It can help parents become more mindful of what they say. If parents resist the desire to attack the other parent or make unfortunate derogatory comments about the other parent or their new spouse or boy friend or girlfriend and so on, it can de-escalate conflict and reduce tit-for-tat.
- Record print outs can be obtained without subpoena when it so agreed and utilized in court proceedings.
- A parent who is being harassed by the other can use the system as a shield not only from personal vitriol but also in defending against a campaign of case making by the other parent.
- It makes huge sense in domestic violence settings.
Potential disadvantages to using www.OurFamilyWizard.com
- It requires Internet access and costs about $100/year.
- If given permission, or if ordered by the Court, other people can be granted access to the records. These people could include judges, lawyers, family mediators, and mental health professionals. While this may be a good thing, as a family lawyer I see this function as dangerous because:
Hearsay which would otherwise not be admitted in a family court proceeding might be reviewed by one of these persons.
There is no way of knowing how judicial officer's or evaluator's views and hence their recommendations for orders were caused or affected by what they read, or even what it is that they read.
- A particular problem is also that one or both parents may still skew the facts or write or an imaginary audience. In other words, a parent can insincerely make offers 'for the record' that appear reasonable at first glance but that are really more sinister in terms of promoting their own agenda. In this sense it can be wrongfully used as a posturing sword.
- If one parent by nature is less vocal or less computer savvy than another, then their silence in response to repeated commentary or requests could be misinterpreted by a reader.
- In cases where one parent is constantly firing off messages or offers or demands, the other parent may be forced to be in constant response.
These of course are not shortcomings of the Family Wizard program, but are a consequences of the tendency of people in high conflict relationship breakup to manipulate appearances.
At least where court proceedings are concerned, which does appear to include the majority of users and to be a major justification for the product, the disadvantages can be minimized if judges and lawyers tailor ground rules for what functions will be used and how they will be used. These would include stipulations about who can access the on-line account, and what foundation is required before the records are introduced into evidence.
|
 |
| Continue reading "Overcoming PARENTING CONFLICTS With OURFAMILYWIZARD.COM" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
|