|
|
|
Recent Posts in Pensions Category
| October 28, 2010 |
| What Do I Do to Protect My Community Interest In PERS and STRS RETIREMENT PLANS? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. What should I consider to ensure that I have a claim in my husband's teacher's retirement plan once he files for divorce?
A. CalPERS (PERS) is the California Public Employee's Retirement System. California Government Code sections 20000 to 21703 describe it. This includes all kinds of California state employees including police officers, firefighters, emergency services employees, and other public safety employees as well as university teachers, professors, and other professionals.
CalSTRS (STRS) is the State Teachers' Retirement System, which is governed by California Education Code sections 22000-25115.
Both require a joinder pursuant to Family Code section 2060 as a condition to complying with an order against the plan, and they are generally cooperative in facilitating this. Likewise, most other municipal plans require joinder and cooperate with parties who are attempting to accomplish it.
In order to protect your rights, we recommend that you not only serve the Joinder Summons and related pleadings (see our Family Law Forms Library page) but that you also give written notice, by certified mail, on the Plan per Family Code section 755.
The joinder process for those California employee benefits that you can join is easy. The forms you need are the
It is important to name the plan correctly. The plan is a separate entity from the employer. Next, they do need to be properly served per FC section 2062.
Within 30 days the plan must respond by a Notice of Appearance. However, they rarely do. If they fail to, the clerk must enter their default. As a practical matter, the Plan will likely accept the order of the court or any settlement you reach thereafter so long as it meets the plan administrator's requirements.
Thurman W. Arnold III, CFLS
www.ThurmanArnold.com |
 |
| Continue reading "What Do I Do to Protect My Community Interest In PERS and STRS RETIREMENT PLANS?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
| October 22, 2010 |
| How Can I STOP My Spouse From LIQUIDATING OUR COMMUNITY PENSION? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. I am afraid my husband may liquidate our 401k and IRA's that are in his name. Is there anything I can to do freeze the accounts or make sure he can't empty them out before I can hire a lawyer or file for dissolution?
A. There is always the risk that one party will loot the community estate in anticipation of a family law proceeding, or that they may even act innocently but still wind up depriving the other spouse of their community interest in a pension asset.
If the spouse in whose name an IRA, 401k, or other pension device is held wants to access these monies and you object, or just want to make it impossible for them to do so without first securing your agreement, there are important steps that will work so long as you undertake them in time.
Two situations with pension plans or retirement assets are common: 1) a retired or disabled spouse is already drawing upon them on a monthly or other basis and 2) or they may want to liquidate the account entirely. The latter situation is especially common, in my experience, with plans valued under $50,000.
Lets assume your husband has a Roth IRA for $50,000. It was opened during marriage when all contributions were made, and half therefore belongs to you. He instructs Fidelity Investments to cash it out. Since this is an early withdrawal (presumably), there is a both a 15% penalty to the IRS (unless the money is rolled into a new IRA within 60 days, or the withdrawal occurs within 60 days from the date of entry of a Divorce Judgment dividing the assets) and the monies he receives will be taxed as ordinary income at rates that depend upon his bracket.
If there is sufficient other property in the community estate to ensure that you will get your half from some other source down the road, this may not be a problem for you. However, down the road has a habit of never arriving and in this economy other assets from which you expected a reimbursement might evaporate.
Perhaps, this is not okay with you from a number of angles. For instance, an exception to the automatic restraining orders contained in the California Dissolution Summons regarding the prohibition from invading accounts allows parties to do so to generate the monies to hire their lawyers. These "ATRO's" will not likely protect you from this type of withdrawal after the fact - however, it may protect you as a preemptory strike. As always I urge you to act fairly and not to abuse power or be manipulative in your divorce.
You have a couple of options for protecting your interests, including joining the pension plan into the family law proceedings.
But the most important and immediate device you can use is a notice to the Plan Administrator pursuant to Family Code section 755(b). Essentially this written demand tells them that you are claiming an adverse interest in the pension assets and its legal effect is to put the Plan on the hook for any payments they make after receiving the notice. They will not release any money once you properly draft and serve it.
Serve it either personally through a process server (which may be difficult and expensive if they are in another town or state), or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
Keep in mind that joinder of certain types of pensions - like federal public entity plans - cannot be achieved through a California joinder pursuant to Family Code section 2060. Thus, this §755 Notice is really important to freeze the status quo pending an ultimate QDRO.
By the way, this will also work to freeze other forms of payments - for instance from insurance companies.
T.W. ARNOLD
"We provide you cutting edge, insider information about the law"
If you appreciate it, take a moment to rate us on Alexa or elsewhere,
or simply comment to our Blog! |
 |
| Continue reading "How Can I STOP My Spouse From LIQUIDATING OUR COMMUNITY PENSION?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(1) |
| |
| October 22, 2010 |
| Are STOCK OPTIONS COMMUNITY PROPERTY? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold, CFLS |
 |
Q. How are stock options treated if I decide to dissolve my domestic partnership?
A. Stock options are commonly used to attract or retain key employees with incentives outside the basic salary structure. Whether you are dissolving a marriage or a RDP (registered domestic partnership), valuing and dividing stock options can be tricky.
The simplest situation is where the stock options were earned before separation. In such cases they are clearly CP. But often there is a question of when these benefits were in fact "earned" because employee services that generate them are sometimes contributed over long periods. These may include a pre-marriage period (when time, skill, and efforts of either party are always SP) and they may extend for some time past the date of physical separation (and so be SP). The question when stock options were earned becomes quite fact specific and depends a lot on what the employer intended and what kind of options they are. In re Marriage of Hug (1984) 154 Cal.App.3d 780, 201 Cal.Rptr. 676.
Stock options that are earned during the marriage, but vest afterwards, generally belong to the community. They are treated as deferred compensation, like certain types of pensions. Usually an employee is granted the right to buy stock, now or in the future, at a fixed price. They may be forced to sell that stock back to the company if they leave. What controls whether the options are characterized as community or separate is when they are granted and when they vest. If they do not vest at all, as where a minimum number of years of service by the employee are required which is not met (even where the employee-spouse quits after separation and so blows them up), they are neither separate or community property - instead, they are not viewed as a property interest at all. In those cases they were a "mere expectancy" that never matured.
In cases where an employee must work for the company for a fixed number of years to be eligible, but the spouses or RDP's separate before those years have been served, the options have both community and SP attributes. To the extent that they result from post-separation efforts too, they must be apportioned between CP and SP. As with how interests in pensions are commonly evaluated, courts tend to follow a "time-rule". The time rule looks like this:
DOG to DOS
__________ X # of Shares Exercisable = C/P shares
DOG to DOV
DOG = Date of Grant
DOS = Date of Separation
DOV = Date of Vesting
Stock options that are granted after the DOS are usually treated as the separate property of the recipient, even where some of the employee's contributions occurred before. This is because of the importance of what the employer intended to the analysis.
This Blog is intended just to give you some sense of the law over these potentially complex questions. As with everything, different facts can lead to different outcomes and stock options are complicated financial devices.
Also, stock option disputes sometimes involve claims of fraud - as where a small closely held company or family business tries to funnel or manipulate how when the options are granted or vest in an effort to favor one spouse over another.
Perhaps the only practical way that a former spouse or partner may learn that stock options exist or when they vest or are exercised is by the self-disclosure of the employee. The law is clear that spouses and domestic partners are required by their fiduciary obligations to make these disclosures. Refusals to disclose can have severe consequences under
Family Code section 1101.
T. W. Arnold III
http://www.MindfulDivorces.com
|
 |
| Continue reading "Are STOCK OPTIONS COMMUNITY PROPERTY?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
| September 25, 2010 |
| How Do I Use a MARITAL BALANCE SHEET to Figure Out How to Best DIVIDE OUR PROPERTY? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. I am considering filing for divorce, and am beginning to pencil out what the division of our assets and debts might look like. What is a good way to go about this?
A. Prepare a Marital Balance Sheet. This will give you an idea of how your property could be divided in a dissolution or legal separation, and to allow you to try out different combinations of division.
Its usefulness will depend the accuracy of your assumptions. Often times more information or outside opinions are required to do this with any degree of correctness. Sometimes the outside opinion that is required is the judge's decision on a disputed issue. Marital balance sheets can range from being exquisitely simple to exceedingly complex. Remember that it is the duty of the Court to divide the community estate equally - this division means an equal division in dollars, not that you divide the family residence with a chain saw.
The format itself is simple. You want two columns, one for you and one for your partner or spouse. You will categorize, value, and assign the community property between each of you. Some categories might be listed on a different balance sheet, like pensions.
Here are some suggestions for drafting a Marital Balance Sheet you can work with.
- Use net value numbers, i.e., equity in homes and automobiles. Secured debt is subtracted from fair market value - it is not divided as unsecured debt would be. If you take the house, you take 100% of the mortgage.
- Be sure to use realistic fair market value numbers. Don't make your final decisions based on Zillow. If your assumptions are flawed, your balance sheet analysis will be of limited use.
- Use wholesale Kelly Blue Book values for cars or at least make sure whatever yardstick you use is consistent for both parties.
- Obtain accurate and current pay-off information as to debts. Typically that will be the value of the debts on the date they are assigned, as adjusted for Epstein Credits.
- Don't treat apples and oranges as apples. For instance, list pension assets as a class separate from other assets - the present value of IRA's, 401k's, and other defined contribution plans is always different than the present value of a bank account. These pension accounts are not valued in real dollars but must be discounted, and that may require a pension forensic or CPA.
- Don't include separate property (the other spouse may dispute that characterization). Pure SP doesn't go on the marital balance sheet.
- Assign the debts, placing those numbers in parentheses to ensure they are subtracted and not added in your running total. Remember that it doesn't matter in whose name a credit card is parked. If a debt was incurred during marriage the general rule as between spouses is that each owes 50-50.
- Separate property debts don't go onto the balance sheet because they don't get evenly divided and if they were listed you may inadvertently charge yourself for half.
- Use total values rather than 1/2 community values. These numbers get divided as one of the last steps.
- Don't include support or support arrears.
- Calculate and note Watts' and Jeffries' claims
- List professional practices and businesses but realize you probably have no practical way to put a number on them, would be entirely guessing as to their value, and would probably be wrong anyway. Understand that business are worth more than the sum of their balance sheets or book values.
- If you share this document with your spouse, be sure to write "Confidential Evidence Code section 1152 Materials" on it, which makes them inadmissible as evidence against you. Otherwise you may find yourself stuck with your preliminary numbers when that is not what you intended.
- Realize that if you share this document, no matter how preliminary it is, with your spouse you will be creating in them expectations concerning value or division that they may become stuck on.
- Be careful how you treat negative equity on property. For instance, if you own a car that is worth $15,000 but you owe $25,000 and want that vehicle awarded to you, the other party will not be charged for one-half of the $10,000 in negative equity.
- Leased vehicles should be identified but have no value. I believe it is a good idea to list everything that you own or owe whether or not it has a value or can be valued at that time, since this list becomes an important road map for you and your lawyer.
- Make a note of alleged breach of fiduciary duty claims, but don't value them.
- Don't include your separate property. Include their separate property if you claim it to be all or partly community, but understand those aren't real numbers until a judge rules.
- Don't leave the document lying around where someone else might find it.
- If property is held in one spouse's name alone but a mortgage or taxes were paid during marriage, or if it was improved or refinanced during marriage, understand that the community probably has some Moore-Marsden interest in that property but that you will have great difficulty figuring out what that is without expert assistance.
- Similarly, if one spouse owned property (i.e, real estate) prior to marriage and the other was placed on title during the marriage, note to yourself that the property has community and separate property attributes and understand you will need more information or help to value those competing interests.
- Make a note of all separate property contributions you made for the acquisition or improvement of any property. These are called Family Code section 2640 credits.
- List all other reimbursements due to the community. For instance, there are many situations where the community property is used to pay one party's separate obligations (i.e., child support from a previous marriage) and if you know to assert the claim the community may be entitled to a reimbursement.
- List consumer goods like furniture at garage sale prices unless there is something truly special about the items. Nothing is valued at its purchase price or even its replacement cost new.
- Be sure to include loans from parents, work, or family members that were made during the marriage and assign those that relate to your family or work to you.
- Make a note of any gifts to one or the other of you alone that were used to purchase or improve community property, whether they were received before or during the marriage.
- Look at your bank balances at the date of separation and assign those balances appropriately. If your husband emptied the savings account the day before he walked out, list the amount he took under his column.
This is just a starting point and is valuable as a roadmap to get you thinking about what needs to be done to conclude the divorce. Once you discipline yourself to begin to overcome any paralysis you might feel, the marital balance sheet will speak to you about what is important for you, what the issues are, and will give you some idea of what important paperwork you need to obtain to evaluate your interests now or in the future. Get that paperwork at once. You are going to have to do this exercise anyway once a legal actin is filed.
This the some of the information that you must provide in your Declarations of Disclosure. It is an efficient idea to use those forms from the beginning. These California Judicial Council Forms include:
Getting started on this early will make any meeting with a family attorney cheaper and far more useful then if you've not even thought about these things.
To the extent you can determine values or ranges of values, add up the net equity in your column for the community property you want or get, and subtract 100% of the debts that are to be assigned to you. Again, chances are there will be categories where you can't put a number on the items. But if you had the numbers, then after totalling the total net to the other party, subtract the two net numbers. One of you will show a higher number. This number will reflect the over-credit amount to that person which needs to be equalized between you. Divide this number by 2, and the person who netted more owes that resulting number to the one who received less. This amount is called an "equalization payment."
This is just one way to do a marital balance sheet. Often times there is no money to pay the equalization payment because all or most of the community is held in the form of personal and real property. An equalization payment is no good to you unless you can collect it. Perhaps you can get a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on the family residence that is awarded to the wife. That is usually a bad idea - you don't want to become a bank, with all the attendant risks of default and depreciation.
Another option once you have these numbers are pencilled out is to go back and rethink how the property was divided. Maybe you should take those Peter Max lithographs after all. Maybe the residence or that vacant lot must be sold to raise money for the equalization payment. It is frequently seen in Stipulated Judgments or Marital Termination Agreements. It is not common in litigated judgments because courts generally must equalize the division at the time of trial, not in the future. This is why property may be ordered sold to ensure an equal, current division of the estate.
If defined contribution pension plans exist these are a good place to find the money to assure the equalization payment is actually honored. But a 401k with a net asset value of $100,000 might only be worth $80,000 after penalties and ordinary income taxes are charged on it. Pensions can be divided without tax consequences (QDRO's) but if you are owed a $100,000 equalization, creating a new pension in your name and transferring $100,000 from the other party's interest in it is like being handed a check for $80,000.
Thurman W. Arnold III
September 25, 2010
All Rights Reserved |
 |
| Continue reading "How Do I Use a MARITAL BALANCE SHEET to Figure Out How to Best DIVIDE OUR PROPERTY?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
| September 20, 2010 |
| How Can I Be Sure a Court Will Enforce My AGREEMENT Reached With My Spouse OUT OF COURT? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. My wife and I have reached some agreements about support and property division in our dissolution proceedings. Neither of us have attorneys. I want to write something up that is enforceable. Is there anything I should know?
A. If a case has already been filed and so is "pending", and whether you have attorneys or not, if you and your wife reach an agreement on any issue outside of court and you want to be sure that she can't back out of it before it is signed by a Judge and becomes an order, it is essential that you make reference to California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 in any written agreement you prepare.
The terms of all types of agreements that you reach as an incident to pending family law litigation must be independently approved by a court commissioner or judge. Usually these judicial officers just want to know that both parties are in agreement, and will not substitute their opinions for what you've decided, but not always. Particularly where children are involved, judges have an independent obligation to ensure that a child's best interests are protected. Still, judges will not usually reject your agreements - however, if one side backs out before the agreement becomes an order or a judgment, when children are involved a court may be more inclined to refuse to enter the disputed order than it would be if the issues involved property division, debts, or spousal support.
Often times people reach agreements in the hallway outside the courtroom, and then come into court and tell the judge what their agreement is - once that agreement is 'on the record', most courts are going to enforce it. Those agreements often require, however, some further writing like a stipulation and it when the stipulation is presented days or weeks later that the other party may have changed their mind. You now need to enforce that agreement, possibly by a Motion under CCP 664.6.
The problem also arises when cases get settled away from court, during the lunch break, or when the agreement doesn't get put on the record for any number of reasons. Maybe they won't sign some other document that the signed agreement contemplated or obligated them to comply with.
Any agreement you reach with anyone is a contract if certain conditions are met. Unfortunately, failure to abide by such promises may only give rise to a claim for breach of contract under civil law - which is pretty worthless in family law proceedings because you have to file an independent civil action to enforce them, which takes months or years to resolve.
You want enforceable orders. These are something more than mere verbal or written promises, or contracts that haven't ripened into Orders or Judgments.
C.C.P. section 664.6 is extremely important and useful for enforcing written agreements, because it gives the Court the power to enforce the terms of those the agreements as court orders, and to interpret them later if there is disagreement about what was in fact agreed to.
However, in order for 664.6 to work for you, you need to either reference the statute in the document that is signed or in an oral statement on the record. You don't need to mention the section specifically, but I recommend that the following language should appear in the agreement or court transcript: "The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement per CCP 664.6" is the optimal language to use.
Thurman Arnold
http://www.DesertDivorceandFamilyLawyer.com
|
 |
| Continue reading "How Can I Be Sure a Court Will Enforce My AGREEMENT Reached With My Spouse OUT OF COURT?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
| September 13, 2010 |
| How are DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS divided in California DIVORCE? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. How are defined contribution plans divided in California dissolutions?
A. A defined contribution pension plan is a plan in which the employer's obligation is based only on its annual contribution. The benefit for the employee on retirement depends on the value of the employee's account at that time. There is no need for expert testimony to determine the present value of a defined contribution plan at dissolution because its value equals [Marriage of Bergman (1985) 168 CA3d 742, 748-749 n4]:
- The amount of contributions made between the marriage and separation, plus accruals; plus
2. Accruals between the date of separation and trial of the issue.
|
 |
| Continue reading "How are DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS divided in California DIVORCE?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| September 13, 2010 |
| How Are DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS divided in California Divorce? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. How are defined benefit plans divided under California law?
A. In a defined benefit pension plan, the benefit does not depend on the dollars contributed by employee or employer, but is based on a combination of factors, including the following [Marriage of Bergman (1985) 168 CA3d 742, 748 n4]:
- Highest income level achieved,
- Years of service at retirement, and
- Age at retirement.
To determine the present value of such a plan, it is necessary that expert testimony, normally from an actuary,
be presented. This testimony includes the expert's opinion as to present value, and what economic, health, and other factors the expert considered in reaching the opinion. [Marriage of Bergman, supra.]
The valuation of a participant's interest in a defined benefit retirement plan is calculated by [Marriage of Stephenson (1984) 162 CA3d 1057, 1083]:
- Determining the value of the pension measured at the future retirement date, then
- Discounting that value back to the present date of valuation.
Family Code section 2610 is the most important statute on pension benefits and rights in dissolution, but federal law governs many pension rights and obligations.
|
 |
| Continue reading "How Are DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS divided in California Divorce?" » |
|
Permalink |
| |
| May 19, 2010 |
| When are ASSETS VALUED for purposes of DIVISION in a California DISSOLUTION? |
| Posted By Thurman Arnold |
 |
Q. My wife and I separated two years ago and we have decided to file for divorce. We don't agree on what date we should be setting the value of some of our property, like the residence where she has been living with the kids all this time. She wants it valued today, since prices are down, but when I left we agreed that she would take it at its value then. That value was substantially higher than today, and I don't think it is fair that I have suffer the decrease in real estate prices. What might a Court do?
A. First, it is always my hope that you and your spouse can agree on as many issues as possible, without court intervention. One never knows for sure what a Court will do, and my experience is that people are far better off working through their disagreements by way of Mediation. One reason why is to ensure you are in charge of your life, not a stranger. It is possible to mediate parts of your divorce.
Still, valuing real property is not a difficult legal issue. Family Code section 2552(a) directs the court to "value assets and liabilities as near as practicable to the time of trial." Time of trial is also the equivalent of the time of settlement - in order words, if you cannot settle your divorce and you take it to a judge, that will be the time of trial so the same rule for the date of valuation should apply to your settlement negotiations.
Family Code section 2552(b), however, gives the court discretion to pick another date before trial for the valuation of property "for good cause" in order to "accomplish an equal division of the community estate ... in an equitable manner." This concept is called an "alternate valuation date." It is often applied in cases of business valuations, which is a complex topic I will separately address, but the basic reasons for the potential different treatment includes the fact that business values can be intentionally depressed by the spouse who controls the assets (and so it may not be fair to apply a lower value) or because the "in-spouse" has contributed substantial value to the company since separation and it is not necessarily fair that the other spouse share those benefits.
Here you might argue that you and your spouse reached a verbal agreement to divide all your assets two years ago if that is in fact what you did, in order to hold to those values. But verbal agreements are difficult to prove if they are not admitted by the other party, absent witnesses and she will continue have various defenses where she was not independently advised before reaching agreement.
Most courts are going to value passive assets like houses or investments or pensions at the time of trial. That does not mean that post-separation increases in value, like increased equity by paying down principal on a mortgage, or contributions to a pension after the date of separation, will not be reimbursed to one or the other of you to compensate the separate property (post-separation) contributions.
If you do seek an alternate valuation date, you need to file a Notice of Motion to Bifurcate the issue (FL-315), along with the accompanying declaration establishing why this is more fair and appropriate than the basic rule. These forms appear in our Family Law Form Library.
A bifurcation is essentially a request of the court to carve off one or more issues in the divorce for separate trial or adjudication. It is often used where a call needs to be made on one issue that, once decided, will assist in resolving other aspects of the case.
Thurman W. Arnold III
http://www.thurmanarnold.com |
 |
| Continue reading "When are ASSETS VALUED for purposes of DIVISION in a California DISSOLUTION?" » |
|
Permalink | Comments(0) |
| |
|
|
|
|