Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.260 - "Time for Response to Interrogatories"

When Responses Are Due to Interrogatories

Answers are due within 30 days of the date you mail your interrogatories, plus five more for mailing unless they are personally served - the latter being a good idea when timing is critical. However, where time is not critical judges expect parties to grant reasonable requests from the other side for extensions of time. Sometimes these extensions may be granted on condition that the answering party waive any right to object to them.

The effect of not getting an extension and to not timely answer the interrogatories is that ALL objections are deemed waived by operation of law, and there is no basis for refusing to not answer all the questions in full! Don't make this mistake.

Need to Learn How Interrogatories Should Be Used in California Divorce and Family Law?


CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES

Response to Interrogatories

C.C.P. Section 2030.260

(a) Within 30 days after service of interrogatories, the party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall serve the original of the response to them on the propounding party, unless on motion of the propounding party the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the responding party the court has extended the time for response.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), in an unlawful detainer action or other proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3, the party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall have five days from the date of service to respond, unless on motion of the propounding party the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the responding party the court has extended the time for response.
(c) The party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall also serve a copy of the response on all other parties who have appeared in the action. On motion, with or without notice, the court may relieve the party from this requirement on its determination that service on all other parties would be unduly expensive or burdensome.


Testimonials & Endorsements

  • “Michael Peterson handled this case professionally from mediation to the final orders. Over the 15 month process he helped me view things from a non-emotional stand point which made everything less ...”

    - Demetria R.
  • “Found Mr Arnold to be very level headed and very brave to take on my divorce. He acted very professionally all the way through. Worked very well for us. We used the collaborative process."”

    - Lee M.
  • “When my divorce went to trial, it became imperative for me to hire an attorney. I live in Georgia, so I had to do over the phone consultations. When I spoke with Mr. Arnold, it just "felt right" and I ...”

    - Michelle H.
  • “Thurman is that rare attorney who promotes cooperative, non-adversarial divorce. Where many attorneys exacerbate conflict because it inevitably results in legal fees, Thurman promotes resolution and ...”

    - Stephen J.
  • “Just wanted to thank you for your website. It's encouraging to find attorneys who seem to care. I am working at organizing a conference in Las Vegas to train attorneys to 'do it right for the ...”

    - Danielle D.
/

Contact Us

Call (760) 320-7915 or Fill Out This Form

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Yelp
  • Super Lawyers - Thurman
  • Avvo Rating - Superb Top Divorce Attorney
  • AV Preeminent - 2015
  • Super Lawyers - Michael
  • AAML
  • Coachella Valley's Top lawyers
  • Client Distinction - Thurman
  • California Certified (CBLS)