Probate Code section 5305 - "Ownership of Deposit Accounts"

Dividing Joint Bank Accounts in Divorce Proceedings

Joint bank accounts can create their own unique issues when dividing cash accounts established during the marriage. While section 5305 creates a presumption that the "net contributions" from each spouse to "multiple party" checking accounts, savings accounts, or other forms of joint institutional accounts are community property, to the extent that such contributions cannot be adequately traced to separate property sources (like an inheritance) or that there is an independent written agreement that shows the separate property nature of deposits was waived.

Need More Info About Dividing Bank Accounts in Divorce?


CALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE

MULTIPLE-PARTY ACCOUNTS

OWNERSHIP BETWEEN PARTIES AND THEIR CREDITORS AND SUCCESSORS

Probate Code Section 5305

(a) Notwithstanding Sections 5301 to 5303, inclusive, if parties to an account are married to each other, whether or not they are so described in the deposit agreement, their net contribution to the account is presumed to be and remain their community property.
(b) Notwithstanding Sections 2581 and 2640 of the Family Code, the presumption established by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof and may be rebutted by proof of either of the following:
(1) The sums on deposit that are claimed to be separate property can be traced from separate property unless it is proved that the married persons made a written agreement that expressed their clear intent that the sums be their community property.
(2) The married persons made a written agreement, separate from the deposit agreement, that expressly provided that the sums on deposit, claimed not to be community property, were not to be community property.
(c) Except as provided in Section 5307, a right of survivorship arising from the express terms of the account or under Section 5302, a beneficiary designation in a Totten trust account, or a P.O.D. payee designation, may not be changed by will.
(d) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), a multiple-party account created with community property funds does not in any way alter community property rights.


Testimonials & Endorsements

  • “Michael Peterson handled this case professionally from mediation to the final orders. Over the 15 month process he helped me view things from a non-emotional stand point which made everything less ...”

    - Demetria R.
  • “Found Mr Arnold to be very level headed and very brave to take on my divorce. He acted very professionally all the way through. Worked very well for us. We used the collaborative process."”

    - Lee M.
  • “When my divorce went to trial, it became imperative for me to hire an attorney. I live in Georgia, so I had to do over the phone consultations. When I spoke with Mr. Arnold, it just "felt right" and I ...”

    - Michelle H.
  • “Thurman is that rare attorney who promotes cooperative, non-adversarial divorce. Where many attorneys exacerbate conflict because it inevitably results in legal fees, Thurman promotes resolution and ...”

    - Stephen J.
  • “Just wanted to thank you for your website. It's encouraging to find attorneys who seem to care. I am working at organizing a conference in Las Vegas to train attorneys to 'do it right for the ...”

    - Danielle D.
/

Contact Us

Call (760) 320-7915 or Fill Out This Form

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Yelp
  • Super Lawyers - Thurman
  • Avvo Rating - Superb Top Divorce Attorney
  • AV Preeminent - 2015
  • Super Lawyers - Michael
  • AAML
  • Coachella Valley's Top lawyers
  • Client Distinction - Thurman
  • California Certified (CBLS)