Nonparent Custody Attorney
Grandparent Rights
Grandparents, step-parents and others are being called upon to assume
in the day to day care and rearing of children in record numbers. A variety
of adults, whether related by blood or marriage or not, may need to step
forward and assume the role of parent when children's best interests require
it. Such situations are often temporary and sometimes not. Disputes may
arise between these grandparent caretakers and their own children over
who should continue the primary parenting role of such minors. It can
be the case that a child's best interests is not to be living with a parent
having medical, legal, economic, or psychological difficulties. Unfortunately
California law concerning nonparent custody is complicated and difficult,
and favors biology over nurturing (based primarily on United States Supreme
Court rulings). Still, there are circumstances where nonparents may be
awarded custody over a parent's objection.
California Family Code section 3040 creates an order of preference for the custody of children which begins with custody to both, or to either, parent. This parental preference is limited only by the best interests of children where parental custody can be demonstrated to be detrimental to children. Section 3040 provides that if custody should not be or is not granted to either parent, custody may be awarded to the person or persons in whose home the child has been living in a "wholesome and stable" environment. These persons are often grandparents.
Family Code section 3041 creates a legal presumption in favor of parents, which a challenger may
only overcome by presenting to the Family Court "
clear and convincing evidence" that "granting custody to a parent would be detrimental to
the child and that granting custody to the nonparent is required to serve
the best interest of the child."
"Clear and convincing" evidence means evidence 'so clear as to
leave no substantial doubt' or evidence which is 'sufficiently strong
to command the unhesitating assent of every reasonable mind'. The most
difficult burden to satisfy in American law is the familiar "beyond
a reasonable doubt" standard of criminal prosecutions. The easiest
is the "preponderance of the evidence" standard. The preponderance
standard may be likened to the scales tipping slightly in favor of one
party - 51% - meaning that something that must be proved is only slightly
more probable to be true than not. Clear and convincing proof is said
to require proof to an 80 to 85% certainty.
In grandparent or other nonparent custody cases there is a valuable exception
to the clear and convincing evidence standard under this statute that
makes it quite possible for grandparents and others to obtain an award
of physical custody. FC section 3041(c) defines "detriment to the
child" as: "includ[ing] the harm of removal from a stable placement
of a child with a person who has assumed, on a day-to-day basis, the role
of his or her parent, fulfilling both the child's physical needs and the
child's psychological needs for care and affection, and who has assumed
that role for a substantial period of time." This should give you
a ray of hope - it is the key that may unlock the door for you.
If an applicant can show by a
preponderance of the evidence that they have already assumed this role of stable placement the "clear
and convincing" burden in favor of bio-parents evaporates. In such
situations, courts will find in favor on nonparents.
Contact Arnold, Peterson & Criste today for a Free Initial Consultation concerning your grandparent custody or visitation matter.
We serve grandparents and step-parents particularly within the desert cities of Palm Springs, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Rancho Mirage, Joshua Tree, Blythe, Hemet, Twenty-Nine Palms, Cathedral City, Indio, Desert Hot Springs, Yucca Valley, Riverside, and Rancho Cucamonga!

Testimonials & Endorsements
-
“If you are going through a divorce, The Law Offices of Arnold, Peterson & Criste is in my opinion the best option available. Mr. Peterson and his assistant Jordyn are top notch. Not only is Mr. ...”
- Josh Arguijo -
“I am a Veteran and Retired Deputy Sheriff. My divorce involved complicated property distribution and spousal support issues. I spent considerable time looking for the best Counsel I could find before ...”
- Jeff Jones -
“I recently had the pleasure of speaking directly with Mr. Thurman regarding my pending Dissolution of Marriage. While researching legal issue I came across his Family Law Blog multiple times and ...”
- Marc Rittner -
“Needed to modify a settlement and hired Mike Peterson. Mike is very, very knowledgeable and experienced. When you are going through a divorce or child custody issues, it is the most terrifying and ...”
- Donika McKelvie -
“Micheal Peterson is very knowledgeable of law and can help you make the best decisions for your family. He does is job with integrity. He helps with giving discounts when he can . I would highly ...”
- Vincent Hall